The story of Alexander Crummell reads like a religious parable that preaches a message based on resilience. Despite the obstacles Crummell faced throughout his journey, he never gave up in the face of adversity. Du Bois conveys the idea that Crummell’s struggles are indicative of what afflicts the African American community. The chapter on Crummell can be seen as the antithesis to Du Bois’ chapter on Booker T. Washington of whom he is critical. Understanding his criticism of Washington is integral to uncovering the meaning behind Crummell’s story as it provides an exemplary model for Black leadership.
Du Bois is critical of Washington’s conciliatory approach toward social change which was premised on pacifying measures. Washington’s “Atlanta Compromise” speech promoted conciliation in the South by giving up the fight for Black civil rights. According to Du Bois, not only does such an approach negate the Black identity, it also suppresses the spirit of “revolt and revenge” which creates an impediment for Black progress. In contrast to Washington’s acquiescence, Crummell reacted differently when faced with a dilemma on his journey. Bishop Onderdonk said to Crummell: “I will receive you into this diocese on one condition: no Negro priest can sit in my church convention, and no Negro church must ask for representation there.” Crummell’s refusal to become complicit is the type of resistance that resonates deeply with Du Bois. Interestingly, Du Bois seeks to glorify an unsung Black hero with an unyielding resolve. Despite Crummell not being renowned, he epitomizes the type of leadership needed by the Black community to achieve greater prosperity.
Another important comparison to make is with John Jones in the chapter titled ‘Of the Coming of John.’ A prominent similarity between Crummell and Jones is that both of them are faced with similar temptations because of their experiences. Unlike Crummell, Jones gives in to these temptations, and eventually perishes in the Valley of the Shadow of Death. In comparison, Crummell astonishingly overcomes the temptations of hate, despair, and doubt. Despite the obstacles, Crummell continued to learn and preach. Du Bois shows that Crummell’s journey is far from a failure—it is a story of uncompromising resilience.
Du Bois argues that despite Crummell’s anonymity, he was an important figure. His story is indicative of the prejudice African Americans have historically faced. Within historical narratives, accounts of Black resilience and strength are obscured. Being able to control your own image is a sign of power. Du Bois argues that to reclaim that power and further the cause of achieving social justice, it is important to resist. Mounting a resistance can take on various forms, as shown by the comparison between Washington and Crummell. Irrespective of its form, this resistance must not be premised on compromises as it would only further entrench the Veil instead of lifting it.
“But Alexander Crummell it gave back. Out of the temptation of Hate, and burned by the fire of Despair, triumphant over Doubt, and steeled by Sacrifice against Humiliation, he turned at last home across the waters, humble and strong, gentle and determined. He bent to all the gibes and prejudices, to all hatred and discrimination, with that rare courtesy which is the armor of pure souls.” – W. E. B. Du Bois