For the purpose of my final paper, I want to look at the pedagogy outlined by the Brazilian educationist Paulo Freire as decolonial aesthetics. What Freire set out to do in 1970 has long since become a blueprint for political activists, leftist intellectual, teachers, politicians, psychologists, radical theologians- the list is endless, who hope to bring about any semblance of change with the current structures. His work outlines the need to reconceptualize the paradigms of our education system in light of various structures of power and oppression by posing a critical, problem-posing pedagogy. For Freire, literacy or rather how literacy is imparted, had the power to create a free subject. Education was a project that was humanizing when it was critical, dialogical and praxical. It could not be apolitical, for it either created students that conformed to the present system or became ‘the practice of freedom.’ It is this concept- education/teaching as freedom that I am interested in. While Freire never strictly limits the group he refers to as oppressed, he cites them as the poor in Brazil who are crushed under the rubric of both capitalism and dictatorship. Even so, his understanding of a ‘death-affirming climate of oppression’ and the subject it produces allows fo the world to use Freire to understand the oppressed under multiple different power structures, including colonial government. Freire speaks of the dehumanization that is intrinsic to power relations. For him humanization does not take place without dehumanization. His detailing of what this dehumanization looks like and the effect it has on the psyche of the oppressed is emblematic of what Fanon, Memmi and other postcolonial thinkers are writing about. “The conflict lies in the choice between being wholly themselves or being divided; between ejecting the oppressor within or not ejecting him; between following prescription or having choices; between being spectators or actors…This is the tragic dilemma of the oppressed which their education must take into account”. Pedagogy of the Oppressed is decolonial precisely in this act, it demands that the way the colonised are taught about their own community, about their own image, must be done by themselves. For no one understands them better than them: “a pedagogy which must be forged with not for the oppressed (be they individuals or whole people) in the incessant struggle to regain their humanity.”
What makes this an aesthetic to me, more than its applicability to the social, political and economic violence inflicted on the colonised countries, is the ethic of hope that this text is loyal to. It is a labour of love, at the heart of which is Freire’s uncompromising belief that there is beauty left to redeem and and that the oppressed can make it material. Hope, follows all the texts he wrote in his lifetime and twenty years later he writes the Pedagogy of Hope.
“From these pages I hope at least the following will endure: my trust in the people, and my faith in men and in the creation of a world in which it is easier to love.”
This paper will be most probably take the form of a boring old paper (for now).






